Fin
This blog is not currently updated, but you're welcome to browse around.
"What is historically odd is that as gay marriage is gaining acceptance, the resistance to polygamy is much more powerful."It's easy to argue - because it's true - that being gay was once as unacceptable as polygamy is today; to argue that we'll soon see polygamists join the battle for equality in any meaningful way, however, seems to strike a discordant melody. Why?
"The gay games are supported and endorsed by dozens of homosexual activist groups and organizations, including homosexual magazines and television outlets."Most of their alerts, while no less anti-gay, are usually better defined. Why is Kraft's sponsorship of an event that is attended by gays on private property, not televised on public airwaves or even paid attention to by national media is unclear.
"The governor's kind of bi about this issue. In one venue he swings for civil unions and in another venue he says he has always been against them.''The Governor's flip-flop on this issue certainly provided more than adequate reason for a response from the Massachusetts GLPC, but the one they gave was childish and demeaning to the community they purport to defend. Ms. Isaacson may have thought her quips about the Governor being "bi" or "swinging" this way or that are cute, but if they were uttered by someone on the other side, she (and the folks over at GLAAD would likely find it offensive.
"If company has fifteen or more employees, they will now be compelled by law to hire a representative percentage of gays, just like they must hire a representative percentage of minorities. This includes CHURCH employees. Wicked, truly wicked."I can only say that this is completely invalid. Yes, the law applies only to businesses with 15 employees or more. But no where in Illinois law are you required to hire minorities. Granted, you can't NOT hire someone simply because they are black, handicapped or gay, but you're not required to seek them out to fill out your stable.